This article was originally published on the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance’s website. As with articles published on Sacred Stories, it is meant to strengthen the capacity of all faith-based organizations to live out their faith-based missions. If you are already a Sacred Sector participant, log into the Participant Portal to access the toolbox resources. If your organization is interested in becoming a Sacred Sector participant, click here.

By Chelsea Langston Bombino

On the last Saturday of October, a man armed with an AR-15 style rifle and three handguns entered the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, yelling: “all Jews must die. ” The gunman took the lives of 11 Shabbat service-goers.

This act against God and man is hard to put into words. And even harder is to consider what our response should be – particularly as people of faith who recognize that this act occurred to people of faith. In the wake of this tragic act many questions remain. What is the right response from the Christian church? From those of other diverse faith communities? From individual citizens and family? How should policymakers, advocates and faith-based service providers respond? What about those who hold strong views on violence prevention or racial justice?

Equally complex is the question of the right roles and responsibilities of government with respect to reducing gun violence in the United States. Those on both sides of the gun rights/gun control debate face an especially polarizing environment that does not lend itself easily to collaboration. Those who advocate for religious freedom face a similarly challenging political and cultural context.

Attacks such as the one in Pittsburgh victimize people practicing one of the most fundamental expressions of freedom: the freedom to exercise religion in community. Faith-based organizations, especially those that defend religious freedom, may want to consider developing holistic, integrated responses to such horrific acts of violence against faith communities. Although the Pittsburgh tragedy is hard to fathom, faith-based organizations should prayerfully consider what they might learn and how they might prepare in every aspect of their organizational lives: understanding the public policy context, adopting best practices to reduce the risk of violence and considering their public response to such tragedies as these.

Public Policy

Many faith communities and advocates of religious freedom are horrified and heartbroken by the unthinkable acts of the anti-Semitic gunman in Pittsburgh last month. A diversity of religious and political voices have come out and labeled this mass shooting in a sacred space a violation of the 1st Amendment constitutional principles which are the bedrock to American civic life:

Vice President Mike Pence stated, “What happened in Pittsburgh today was not just criminal. It was evil. An attack on innocent Americans and an assault on our freedom of religion. There is no place in America for violence or anti-semitism and this evil must end.”

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints’ official statement reads: “When the security and religious freedom of our Jewish brothers and sisters is violated, we all suffer. Houses of worship should be safe, inviolate places for people of all faiths to join in sacred fellowship and seek communion with God.”

The American Jewish Committee, in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, called on all Americans to exercise their freedom to assemble in holy spaces:  “Jews and non-Jews alike — should consider attending synagogue services this weekend. We’re calling it #ShowUpForShabbat. It’s a way of demonstrating unity and shared destiny, of saying ‘no fear.’”

Yet, despite public and religious figures overtly tying the murder of 11 innocents in a sanctuary to a violation of their fundamental freedom to exercise of faith, it remains unclear whether this language is meant to connote an actual, actionable violation of legal or constitutional protections for religious freedom. Clearly, the massacre at the Tree of Life Synagogue violated many other criminal and hate crime laws. When public voices call on the Pittsburgh shooting as a violation of religious freedom, their usage seems to transcend the confines of public policy and speaks to broader principles upon which we agree to live together in a pluralist civil society.

Communities of faith should consider the legal structures in which they exist, on a local, state and federal level, and make efforts to protect themselves. In particular, congregations and faith organizations should become familiar with local and state gun laws. Many communities of faith may consider whether the time has come to engage in conversations with public officials about public policy solutions to gun violence. Yet even if faith groups or the Trump administration speak publicly about gun control, the solution does not rest on government alone. A public justice framework asks all of us to consider how faith-based organizations, nonprofits, businesses, schools, civic groups and others can work together to address the systemic problem of mass violence in this country, which often impacts the most vulnerable populations.

Institutional Practices

Faith communities are never to blame when they are victimized by violence. They should, however, ask themselves how to cultivate places of worship that are safe and welcoming to their congregants and visitors, including the most vulnerable members of their cherished communities. This is why houses of worship and other faith-based nonprofits should consider how their spiritual beliefs call them to proactively prepare for times of crisis and disaster, including, but not limited to, acts of violence.

Sacred Sector, an initiative of the Center for Public Justice, empowers organizations in the faith-based sector to advance their sacred missions in every area of their institutional lives. To help faith-based nonprofits build their capacity to incarnate their sacred beliefs and missions, Sacred Sector offers resources through Standards for Excellence® Institute as a replication partner. The Standards for Excellence® Institute promotes the highest standards of ethics, effectiveness and accountability in nonprofit governance, management and operations. Sacred Sector encourages faith-based organizations to adhere to the Standards for Excellence® code of ethics and accountability for nonprofit organizations, which includes the following: “A nonprofit should have written, board-approved administrative policies that are periodically reviewed by the board. At a minimum, these policies should address issues such as crisis and disaster planning, information technology, communications and social media.”

The Federal Department of Emergency Management (FEMA) offers valuable Resources to Protect Your House of Worship in case of an active shooter. In this way, the federal government may be seen by congregations and other faith-based nonprofits as a valuable partner in empowering them to prepare for preventing, assessing risk for and responding to such disasters. FEMA also provides technical assistance for interested faith communities in collaboration with other agencies like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). These agencies also offer online educational opportunities, workshops, one-on-one support, written resources and other forms of training and guidance. Specifically in the situation of an active shooter, DHS offers resources for organizations on the following issues: profile of an active shooter, responding to an active shooter, training for active shooter, creating an emergency action plan and tips for recognizing signs of workplace violence.

Houses of worship and other nonprofits may also want to consider whether they could grow their capacities and improve their institutional practices in preparing for crisis situations by applying for a grant to enhance their security. The DHS Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) offers financial support to predominantly urban located organizations, including congregations, at high risk for an attack to support security enhancements on an infrastructure level, such as alarm systems, metal detectors, security guards, etc. According to FEMA’s resource page for congregations, “The NSGP also promotes coordination and collaboration in emergency preparedness activities among public and private community representatives, as well as state and local government agencies.”

Public Positioning

Faith-based organizations and congregations should be more aware of the negative associations many Americans have with religious freedom. Some Americans may question the commitment of certain faith communities to the principle of religious freedom when these faith communities remain silent about solutions to gun violence. They may see religious freedom as a hollow virtue when faith groups do not stand up for reform on a public policy level, even when members of their own congregations become victims of violence as they were exercising their religious freedom to worship. This may not be a fair assessment, but it is important for faith-based organizations to consider public perception.

In an article from left-leaning Slate titled “Trump’s Response to the Pittsburgh Shooting Proves He Doesn’t Actually Care About Religious Liberty,” Mark Joseph Stern accuses the Trump administration of quickly coming to the defense of those who make claims about LGBT nondiscrimination laws and healthcare contraceptive mandates. Stern claims the Administration is quick to protect religious freedom in these contexts, yet the Administration fails to protect the worshippers from a current wave of gun violence in houses of worship by working to pass gun control laws. This article comes up short on many fronts. It fails to acknowledge that Vice President Pence and other administration officials explicitly connected the Pittsburgh shooting to an affront to the free exercise of people of all faiths. Additionally, Stern equates the proper and only response in this case that stands up for religious freedom as passing tougher gun control laws:

“When faced with a spiraling crisis of shootings in houses of worship, on the other hand, Trump found a way to blame the victim. To the Trump administration, religious liberty does not encompass the right to worship without fear of being murdered by a madman with a deadly weapon.”

Despite the article’s bias and inaccuracy at times, it is especially important for faith-based organizations and their leaders to be aware of this viewpoint in the public square. Many Americans will believe that Stern’s article makes valid points about the apparent selectivity and inconsistency in defending religious freedom among conservative faith organizations. And, whether or not it is fair, there are certainly reputational challenges posed to the very idea of religious freedom when communities of faith are perceived as failing to take substantive actions following egregious acts of violence toward people of faith.

An Opportunity for Faith-Based Organizations

Congregations and religious organizations can and should pray for the victims and impacted community members in Pittsburgh. But this tragedy can also be a moment of opportunity for spiritual reflection and sacred action. Even small steps and beginning conversations are important. Faith organizations can consider a holistic approach to preventing and reducing gun violence in their own communities and in American society at large. Such an approach necessitates attention to at least three dimensions. Here are a few actions faith-based organizations may consider taking:

  • Learn the local and state public policies that may impact gun violence. Learn about the process for procuring a firearm and any restrictions on carrying, as well as the mental health supports available in the community. Learn about efforts by local and state governments to reduce gun violence and consider engaging local public officials in creative solutions. This can be done regardless of where faith leaders stand on issues like gun control.

  • Consider adopting best practices, such as writing a plan for your organization to follow in case of a crisis. Also consider engaging staff in trainings and other formal and informal activities that cultivate a culture of preparedness and safety. Your organization may also become familiar with trauma informed care in being prepared to address the emotional damage that such tragic events can create.

  • Consider how your organization can engage in positive public positioning after a tragedy like this. This may involve engaging in a multi-faith effort to care for victims, stand up against such heinous acts of violence or help rebuild a feeling of safety in sacred spaces. This is especially important for faith leaders who are public proponents of religious freedom.

Fellowship Perspective: David Tassell

Almost three years ago, my wife and I had the joy of joining Table Covenant Church, a church plant in Fairfax, Virginia. We immediately connected with the welcoming congregation and church vision: a commitment to the community and to cultivating a deep learning environment. Several months later, the church gave me the opportunity to join the staff as the Pastoral Intern for the remaining two years of my seminary program. These two years afforded me the opportunity to cultivate pastoral leadership in addition to my academic learning, and they drove my learning forward, fueling questions that ultimately connected me with the Sacred Sector Fellowship.

Join Our Informational Webinar on November 7, 2:00pm ET

We are here to support the good work you are already doing in your community, and provide the framework, resources and collaboration you can use to grow. Faith-based organizations face a variety of organizational, political, legal and cultural challenges, and we have developed a 3-part program to guide you through these complex issues. Join us for an informational webinar to find out how Sacred Sector could benefit your organization or network.

Positive Public Engagement: Successfully Living Out Your Faith-Based Mission

Positive Public Engagement: Successfully Living Out Your Faith-Based Mission

Showing community and public officials the distinct value of their mission and services is one way faith-based organizations can preserve their freedom to serve the community in accordance with their religious beliefs. As the Sacred Sector Toolbox on Public Policy states, “Positive public regard can influence lawmakers, regulators and courts to protect the religious freedom that faith-based organizations need.”

America World Adoption Association (AWAA) is a Sacred Sector participant and faith-based organization in McLean, Virginia that employs this concept well.

The Faith Community in Action: A Response to the Opioid Crisis

Broken families, crippling addictions, and tragic deaths: the opioid epidemic has taken an enormous toll on communities throughout the United States. Opioid addiction has been a serious issue in America since the late 1990s, when doctors started prescribing opioid-based painkillers for patients. Initially, opioid abuse primarily affected rural, small-town communities. In recent years, addiction has spread into suburban and urban areas as well. Now, an average of 142 people die every day from opioid-related causes, and the number of people who die of drug overdose in the U.S. every three weeks is equivalent to the number of people who died on 9/11. The opioid epidemic has also had a devastating effect on children and families.

Family-Supportive Workplaces Cultivate Holistic Healing

Paid family leave is an issue that affects almost every American at some point, from the new mother who wants to bond with her baby to the aging grandparent who needs help with medical care. Recently, Senator Marco Rubio introduced a bill that would allow new parents to finance their paid leave by drawing from their Social Security benefits early. Senator Rubio, along with Ivanka Trump, is hopeful that the bill will gain bipartisan support.

Mission-Driven Prayer Ignites Adoption Efforts

In the United States, faith-based adoption agencies have been a trending topic in the news. A recent vote in the House Appropriations Committee approved an amendment to a bill which prohibits the government from discriminating against child welfare agencies because of their “sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions.” This bill will allow more faith-based adoption agencies to live out their religious beliefs by placing children in loving homes without compromising their views on traditional marriage.

Time to Flourish: Excerpt

Christian teaching contains a theology of work. It also affirms the significance of the workplace. Just as workers have a calling, the workplace has a calling as well. Workplaces produce goods and services that benefit customers. When they enlist workers in that creative task, they become the site in which humans live out their vocations. As Michael Naughton, a Catholic scholar of vocation and business, notes, “A community of work is only authentic when it serves those outside it in a way that develops those within it.” A workplace responds to its God-given calling when it treats all of its employees and workers with dignity and respect rather than as mere inputs to a production process.

Faith-based Advocacy Strengthens the Sacred Sector

Faith-based organizations are often caught in a net of contradictions while trying to advocate for justice in the public square. On the one hand, faith-based organizations recognize the biblical call to speak on behalf of the oppressed. On the other hand, advocacy and lobbying can be depicted as inappropriate activities for organizations with sacred missions, especially when government is involved. How are faith-based organizations supposed to bring about justice while avoiding government entanglement?

Sacred Sector Welcomes 12 Seminarians for Summer Fellowship with Faith-Based Organizations

Sacred Sector Welcomes 12 Seminarians for Summer Fellowship with Faith-Based Organizations

WASHINGTON, D.C. (June 15, 2018) – This week, the Center for Public Justice welcomed a group of twelve seminarians as part of the Sacred Sector Fellowship initiative. The program kicked off with a five-day intensive training in Washington, DC. From there, the seminarians will work as consultants for several faith-based organizations located in the Washington, DC region.

Equitable Government Partnerships Foster Student Safety in the Sacred Sector

School safety is not the only discussion that neglects the needs of non-government or faith-based entities. In any matter involving government support, faith-based organizations tend to be overlooked due to the perception that faith-based and government collaborations foster religious establishment or undermine religious freedom. Yet the best way to prevent both religious establishment and religious freedom violations is to allow faith-based and secular organizations to have equal opportunity to apply for government funds.

Trump Announces New Federal Faith And Community Initiative

At a National Day of Prayer ceremony in the White House Rose Garden on May 3, President Donald Trump signed an executive order creating the White House Faith and Opportunity Initiative. This is President Trump’s version of a federal initiative created by President George W. Bush and continued, with changes, by President Barack Obama. The White House Faith and Opportunity Initiative shares much with its predecessors, although it is distinctly different in some ways. What it shares with its predecessors is most important. The new Initiative, like the Bush and Obama programs, represents…

Faith-based Organizations Transform Communities Through Strategic Partnerships

Recent headlines about churches accepting public funds for historic preservation have reignited the public debate about church-state separation. Though not expressly established in the Constitution, the separation of church and state is a value many Americans affirm. Yet this value can also have negative consequences; it tends to enforce the idea that church and state are fundamentally at odds, and that church-state collaborations ultimately undermine the integrity of one institution or the other. However, in reality, when faith-based organizations such as churches and nonprofits choose to partner with government it can benefit the organization, the government and the common good…

The Economic Impact of Faith-Based Colleges and Universities

Christian colleges and universities can often find themselves on the defensive. They may be asked to explain their commitment to their Christian values, their high standards for faculty, staff and students, or how their sacred mission contributes to their academic goals. Although they are frequently scrutinized, the reality is that Christian colleges and universities make irreplaceable contributions to the common good not only in terms of advancing faith and intellect, but also in terms of economic impact…

How Faith-Based Organizations Bolster Local Communities

When a local church is featured in the media, it isn’t usually to highlight its thriving ministry. Media consumers are more interested in church controversy than in the important work of small groups or outreach programs. Media organizations aren’t the only ones missing out on the important work of local churches; in fact, society often perceives the work of local churches as primarily taking place on Sunday mornings. However, many churches contribute extensively…

How Faith-Based Organizations Empower the Marginalized Across Contexts [Part 2 of 2]

Religious freedom is a comprehensive issue that deals with a range of topics. Religious freedom protections have implications for whether an Orthodox Jewish community can build a temple, whether a Muslim man can retain a beard while imprisoned or whether a public university can host a Catholic club on campus. Today, conversations about religious freedom often revolve around the intersection of religion and sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI). While religious freedom has to do with far more than…

How Faith-Based Organizations Empower the Marginalized Across Contexts [Part 1 of 2]

Recent contentions surrounding the term “Evangelical” have forced Christians to reckon with the differences embedded in their faith community. As disagreements arise and counterpoints are exchanged, it is becoming increasingly clear that the terms “Evangelical” and “Christian” can mean a variety of things to different people. Yet despite political or theological divisions…

The Federal Faith-Based Initiative: Good News is Hiding Behind No News

With little to no fanfare, the Trump administration for the last year has been slowly appointing new staff to the federal Centers for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. More importantly, the administration has maintained the federal equal treatment regulations. This is good news for faith-based organizations and for the sacred sector because it means that…